I have a function in R that looks somewhat like this:
setMethod('[', signature(x="stack"),definition=function(x,i,j,drop){
new('class', as(x, "SpatialPointsDataFrame")[i,]) })
I use it to get a single element out of a stacked object. For the package I'm building I need a .Rd file to document the function. I stored it as [.Rd but somehow the R CMD check does not see this. It returns:
Undocumented S4 methods: generic '[' and siglist 'MoveStack,ANY,ANY'
The [.Rd
file starts with these lines:
\name{[}
\alias{[}
\alias{[,stack,ANY,ANY-method}
\docType{methods}
\title{Returns an object from a stack}
\description{Returning a single object}
\usage{
\S4method{\[}{stack,ANY,ANY}(x,i,y,drop)
}
Any idea how I make R CMD check aware of this file?
If you look at the source code of the sp
package, for example SpatialPolygons-class.Rd
, the Methods section:
\section{Methods}{
Methods defined with class "SpatialPolygons" in the signature:
\describe{
\item{[}{\code{signature(obj = "SpatialPolygons")}: select subset of (sets of) polygons; NAs are not permitted in the row index}
\item{plot}{\code{signature(x = "SpatialPolygons", y = "missing")}:
plot polygons in SpatialPolygons object}
\item{summary}{\code{signature(object = "SpatialPolygons")}: summarize object}
\item{rbind}{\code{signature(object = "SpatialPolygons")}: rbind-like method}
}
}
method for [
is defined.
Name and class of the file are
\name{SpatialPolygons-class}
\alias{[,SpatialPolygons-method}
If you look at the help page for ?SpatialPolygons
you should see
> Methods
>
> Methods defined with class "SpatialPolygons" in the signature:
>
> [ signature(obj = "SpatialPolygons"): select subset of (sets of)
> polygons; NAs are not permitted in the row index
>
So I would venture a guess that if you specify a proper (ASCII named) file name, give it an alias as in the above example, you should be fine.