i try to call a partner WS using usernameToken. I use for that ws02 wsf_2.0.0 under php5.2.x and it rocks. Now we want's to migrate on a different solution based on php5.3, fortunately ws02 provide a 2.1.0 tag compatible with php5.3. I take the time to read the new features and documentation of this new release and especially regarding the usernameToken. I understood this release use signing regarding the usernameToken through a cert and private key. I guess b/c of the AsymetricTransportBinding policy. In my case i didn't want to sign anything through certificate or whatever. I read also that ws02 provide a kind of fallback in a separate xml file to avoid any signing.
After reading many posts, forums i need some help from the community b/c i'm totally stuck.
Here's the code used to request the WS in php5.3 - wsf 2.1.0 ( using HTTP )
$policy = new \WSPolicy( $policy ); ( $policy is the one from the call_back folder with a file_get_contents() )
$security = new \WSSecurityToken( array(
'user' => 'my_username',
'password' => 'my_password',
'passwordType' => 'Digest',
'ttl' => '300'
));
$this->oSoapClient = new \WSClient( array(
wsdl: http://www.xxx.xx/comparatorservices/CalculationService?WSDL
to: http://www.xxx.xx/comparatorservices/CalculationService
useWSA: true
useSOAP: 1.1,
policy: $policy,
securityToken: $security
));
$proxy = $this->oSoapClient->getProxy();
$response = $proxy->wykonajKalkulacje( $MySuperRequestObject );
At this step :
I confirm that my "to" is using http accoring to the wsdl definition
wsdl:port name="CalculationServiceHttpPort" binding="tns:CalculationServiceHttpBinding" wsdlsoap:address location="http://www.xxxx.xx/comparatorservices/CalculationService" /wsdl:port
Now from the debug logs i catch this :
[Wed Jul 25 05:22:53 2012] [error] rampart_in_handler.c(91) [rampart]SOAP header cannot be found.
[Wed Jul 25 05:22:53 2012] [error] phase.c(224) Handler RampartInHandler invoke failed within phase Security
[Wed Jul 25 05:22:53 2012] [error] engine.c(657) Invoking phase Security failed
[Wed Jul 25 05:22:53 2012] [error] engine.c(262) Invoking operation specific phases failed for operation __OPERATION_OUT_IN__
[Wed Jul 25 05:22:53 2012] [error] /home/agruet/08_KRK_sources/wso2-wsf-php-src-2.1.0/src/wsf_wsdl.c(1226) [wsf_wsdl] Response envelope not found
So my first idea was to sniff the traffic and especially the SOAP Header between the working ( wsf_2.0.0 / php5.2.x ) and the breaked ( wsf_2.1.0 / php5.3 )
Here's the 2.0.0 ( working )
<soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
<soapenv:Header>
<wsse:Security soapenv:mustUnderstand="1" xmlns:wsse="http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-secext-1.0.xsd" xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
<wsse:UsernameToken xmlns:wsu="http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-utility-1.0.xsd">
<wsse:Username>my_username</wsse:Username>
<wsse:Password Type="http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-username-token-profile-1.0#PasswordDigest">
hashed(my_password)
</wsse:Password>
<wsse:Nonce>hashed</wsse:Nonce>
<wsu:Created>2012-07-26T20:40:26.991Z</wsu:Created>
</wsse:UsernameToken>
</wsse:Security>
</soapenv:Header>
And the 2.1.0 ( not working / breaked )
<soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
<soapenv:Header>
<wsse:Security xmlns:wsse="http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-secext-1.0.xsd" soapenv:mustUnderstand="1">
<wsse:UsernameToken xmlns:wsu="http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-utility-1.0.xsd">
<wsse:Username>my_username</wsse:Username>
<wsse:Password
Type="http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-username-token-profile-1.0#PasswordDigest">hashed(my_password)</wsse:Password>
<wsse:Nonce>hashed</wsse:Nonce>
<wsu:Created>2012-07-25T00:44:56.758Z</wsu:Created>
</wsse:UsernameToken>
</wsse:Security>
</soapenv:Header>
As u can see the only difference come from the wsse:Security namespace. ( missing xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/ )
And that's all ...
Inspecting the rampart_in_handler.c at line 91 according to the debug log said :
soap_header = axiom_soap_envelope_get_header(soap_envelope, env);
if(!soap_header)
{
/*No SOAP header, so no point of proceeding. FAIL*/
AXIS2_LOG_ERROR(env->log, AXIS2_LOG_SI, "[rampart]SOAP header cannot be found.");
return AXIS2_FAILURE;
}
Meaning yeah.... the soap_header is false.. but why? Is there any smart guy in order to explain what's wrong ?
nota 1: I inspected the policy sent to the partner WS from the working ( 2.0.0 ) it seem's a AsymetricBinding is used... wich is weird as long in the 2.0.0 we didn't provide any cert or keys.
nota 2: I also tried to use signed username token with the classic WSPolicy Object array params - I created a x509 cert and privatekey then use the functions to load these files and use the array params to load it into the WSSecurity Constructor... but i receive the same error / Sniffing is a pain b/c the datas are crypted or something like that ( wich seem's to be normal in this way )
nota 3: Currently tested on Ubuntu10.04-3LTS with the pre-compiled php packges from apt-get
PLZ HELP !
I finally found the issue and i fixed the rampart_in_handler.c:91
The issue was coming from the response and not from the request... I Inspected through a tcp sniffer and the response from the partner WS was made without any soap:Header.
Compliant or not with standards, with the last release ( 2.0.0 ) it was working. So i decided to tweak a little bit the code in rampart_in_handler.c file to return a success in the case of soap header is missing...
In my opinion and PLZ correct me if I'm wrong :
The test on the soapHeader response was added certainly b/c of the asymetricBinding transport and the new signed usernametoken case. However, if we want to use usernametoken without signing ( through the basic policy.xml ) AND the response is made without any soap:Header ; then rampart will always return a failure...
Also, i analysed the php code under the scripts/ folder regarding the way wsf handle the response and i saw on this file : wsf_wsdl.php
under the function wsf_process_response()
:
if($response_header_string && !empty($response_header_string)) {
$header_dom = new DomDocument();
$header_dom->preserveWhiteSpace = FALSE;
$header_dom->loadXML($response_header_string);
}
Meaning on the php side, when the data are received, wsf/php assume a case without any soapHeader... ( there is no failure if the soapHeader is missing ) Super weird !?
At last but not least, i found a weird bug on both wsf_wsdl_serialization.php
and wsf_wsdl_deserialization.php
files.
For instance if you plan to send and/or receive params/values with a string like that :
"110% Sigma of something"
It will fail and create a segfault during serialize/unserialize process !
Now i'm wondering myself why ? But at a first view, for sure, "110% Sig.." contain "% S" and it's pretty closed of "%s"...
I think this bug is this one mentioned here :
http://old.nabble.com/WSF-PHP-server-segfault-on-wsf_wsdl_serialization.php---td24329956.html
If i change the S by D or anything else it works...
What a pain...