oracle-databaseplsqljmsadvanced-queuing

PL/SQL function in Oracle cannot see DBMS_AQ


I have problem with Oracle 9.2 and JMS. I created PL/SQL routine to send XML text (from file or CLOB) to queue, but this routine do not compile.

My code looks like (filling message omitted):

create or replace procedure jms_test(msg varchar2)
is
    id                 pls_integer;
    message            sys.aq$_jms_stream_message;
    enqueue_options    dbms_aq.enqueue_options_t;
    message_properties dbms_aq.message_properties_t;
    msgid raw(16);

    java_exp           exception;
    v_filehandle_input utl_file.file_type;
    v_newline     varchar2(32767);
    pragma exception_init(java_exp, -24197);
begin
    message := sys.aq$_jms_stream_message.construct;
    message.set_string_property('FROM', 'TEST');
    id := message.clear_body(-1);
end;

And Oracle raports that:

Error(6,21): PLS-00201: identifier 'DBMS_AQ' must be declared

I looked at some newsgroups and tried all that I found, but with no success.

  1. granted (with success) many permisions

    • GRANT RESOURCE TO user;
    • GRANT CONNECT TO user;
    • GRANT EXECUTE ANY PROCEDURE TO user;
    • GRANT aq_administrator_role TO user;
    • GRANT aq_user_role TO user;
    • GRANT EXECUTE ON dbms_aqadm TO user;
    • GRANT EXECUTE ON dbms_aq TO user;
    • GRANT EXECUTE ON dbms_aqin TO user;
  2. desc dbms_aq shows many functions like DEQUEUE, ENQUEUE, LISTEN

  3. executed in SQLPlus both catqueue.sql and dbmsaq.plb

Anybody have idea what can be wrong?

EDITED:

I can do all that is described in: http://rwijk.blogspot.com/2009/02/whats-in-my-jms-queue.html, so dbms_aq is somehow visible, but not in my procedure.


Solution

  • Does it work if you do...

    SYS.DBMS_AQ 
    

    instead of just

    DBMS_AQ
    

    If so, you're missing a synonym.

    EDIT:

    If you're now getting "PLS-00201: identifier 'SYS.DBMS_AQ" then I'd double check your grants.

    GRANT EXECUTE ON SYS.DBMS_AQ to <your-user>;
    

    Also, just to confirm, you've granted the execute privilege directly to the user, and not via a role?