handling void type in template

I have a templated function that invokes another function and stores its return value, then does some work before returning the value. I'd like to extend this to handle T = void, and was wondering if specialization is my only option.

template<typename T>
T Foo( T(*Func)() ) 
{
    // do something first (e.g. some setup)
    T result = Func();
    // do something after (e.g. some tear down)
    return result;
}

// Is this specialization the only option?
template<>
void Foo<void>( void(*Func)() ) 
{
    // do something first (e.g. some setup)
    Func();
    // do something after (e.g. some tear down)
    return;
}

void Bar() {}
int BarInt() { return 1; }

int main()
{
    Foo<int>(&BarInt);
    Foo<void>(&Bar);
}

Or can the regular version of Foo be modified to handle the void type and basically do nothing in that case? I was thinking that maybe my local result could be wrapped in a type that could handle void maybe, but could also see the assignment as being a deal-breaker.

Given that your operation does not depend on the result of the function, you can do it without a specialization. It is ok for a function returning void to return an expression of type void. So the return part is not the troublesome one, but you need to figure out a way to do the pre and post operations. Constructors and destructors will help you there:

struct do_something_helper
{
    do_something_helper()
    {
        // do something first (e.g. take a lock)
    }
    ~do_something_helper()
    {
        // do something after (e.g. release a lock)
    }
};

Then you can write your function like this:

template<typename T>
T Foo( T(*Func)() ) 
{
    do_something_helper _dummy_helper; // constructor called here

    return Func();
    // destructor called here
}

For a more general solution using lambdas as you commented, it could look like this:

template< typename Pre, typename Post >
struct scope_guard
{
    scope_guard( Pre&& pre, Post&& post )
      : _post( std::forward< Post >( post ) )
    {
        pre();
    }
    ~scope_guard()
    {
        _post();
    }

    Post _post;
};

template< typename Pre, typename Post >
scope_guard< Pre, Post > make_scope_guard( Pre&& pre, Post&& post )
{
    return scope_guard< Pre, Post >( std::forward< Pre >( pre ), std::forward< Post >( post ) );
}

template<typename T>
T Foo( T(*Func)() ) 
{
    auto do_something_helper =
        make_scope_guard(
            [](){ /* do something first (e.g. take a lock) */ },
            [](){ /* do something after (e.g. release a lock) */ }
        );

    return Func();
}

A type-erased version using std::function< void() > would be easier to write and use, but it would be rather inefficient.