clinuxgcc64-bittime-t

Is there any way to get 64-bit time_t in 32-bit programs in Linux?


On Windows I can call:

_time32(__time32_t); // to get 32-bit time_t
_time64(__time64_t); // to get 64-bit time_t

(both in 32 and 64-bit programs)

Is there any way do this in Linux (compiling with GCC)?


Solution

  • Apparently, no it's not possible. For starters, there is only one time() function in Linux, no time32() or time64().

    After searching for a while, I can see that it's not libc's fault, but the culprit is actually the kernel.

    In order for libc to fetch the current time, it need to execute a system call for it: (Source)

    time_t time (t) time_t *t;
    {
        // ...
        INTERNAL_SYSCALL_DECL (err);
        time_t res = INTERNAL_SYSCALL (time, err, 1, NULL);
        // ...
        return res;
    }
    

    The system call is defined as: (Source)

    SYSCALL_DEFINE1(time, time_t __user *, tloc)
    {
        time_t i = get_seconds();
        // ...
        return i;
    }
    

    The function get_seconds() returns an unsigned long, like so: (Source)

    unsigned long get_seconds(void)
    {
        struct timekeeper *tk = &timekeeper;
    
        return tk->xtime_sec;
    }
    

    And timekeeper.xtime_sec is actually 64-bit: (Source)

    struct timekeeper {
        // ...
        /* Current CLOCK_REALTIME time in seconds */
        u64                     xtime_sec;
        // ...
    }
    

    Now, if you know your C, you know that the size of unsigned long is actually implementation-dependant. On my 64-bit machine here, it's 64-bit; but on my 32-bit machine here, it's 32-bit. It possibly could be 64-bit on some 32-bit implementation, but there's no guarantee.

    On the other hand, u64 is always 64-bit, so at the very base, the kernel keeps track of the time in a 64-bit type. Why it then proceeds to return this as an unsigned long, which is not guaranteed to be 64-bit long, is beyond me.

    In the end, even if libc's would force time_t to hold a 64-bit value, it wouldn't change a thing.

    You could tie your application deeply into the kernel, but I don't think it's even worth it.