def GaussianMatrix(X,sigma):
row,col=X.shape
GassMatrix=np.zeros(shape=(row,row))
X=np.asarray(X)
i=0
for v_i in X:
j=0
for v_j in X:
GassMatrix[i,j]=Gaussian(v_i.T,v_j.T,sigma)
j+=1
i+=1
return GassMatrix
def Gaussian(x,z,sigma):
return np.exp((-(np.linalg.norm(x-z)**2))/(2*sigma**2))
This is my current way. Is there any way I can use matrix operation to do this? X is the data points.
Do you want to use the Gaussian kernel for e.g. image smoothing? If so, there's a function gaussian_filter() in scipy:
Updated answer
This should work - while it's still not 100% accurate, it attempts to account for the probability mass within each cell of the grid. I think that using the probability density at the midpoint of each cell is slightly less accurate, especially for small kernels. See https://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/rbf/HIPR2/gsmooth.htm for an example.
import numpy as np
import scipy.stats as st
def gkern(kernlen=21, nsig=3):
"""Returns a 2D Gaussian kernel."""
x = np.linspace(-nsig, nsig, kernlen+1)
kern1d = np.diff(st.norm.cdf(x))
kern2d = np.outer(kern1d, kern1d)
return kern2d/kern2d.sum()
Testing it on the example in Figure 3 from the link:
gkern(5, 2.5)*273
gives
array([[ 1.0278445 , 4.10018648, 6.49510362, 4.10018648, 1.0278445 ],
[ 4.10018648, 16.35610171, 25.90969361, 16.35610171, 4.10018648],
[ 6.49510362, 25.90969361, 41.0435344 , 25.90969361, 6.49510362],
[ 4.10018648, 16.35610171, 25.90969361, 16.35610171, 4.10018648],
[ 1.0278445 , 4.10018648, 6.49510362, 4.10018648, 1.0278445 ]])
The original (accepted) answer below accepted is wrong The square root is unnecessary, and the definition of the interval is incorrect.
import numpy as np
import scipy.stats as st
def gkern(kernlen=21, nsig=3):
"""Returns a 2D Gaussian kernel array."""
interval = (2*nsig+1.)/(kernlen)
x = np.linspace(-nsig-interval/2., nsig+interval/2., kernlen+1)
kern1d = np.diff(st.norm.cdf(x))
kernel_raw = np.sqrt(np.outer(kern1d, kern1d))
kernel = kernel_raw/kernel_raw.sum()
return kernel