I have two directory entries, a and b. Before, a and b point to different inodes. Afterwards, I want b to point to the same inode as a does. I want this to be safe - by which I mean if it fails somewhere, b either points to its original inode or the a inode. I especially don't want to end up with b disappearing.
mv is atomic when overwriting, and ln appears to not work when the destination already exists. So it looks like i can say:
ln a tmp
mv tmp b
which in case of failure will leave a 'tmp' file around, which is undesirable but not a disaster.
Is there a better way to do this?
(What I'm actually trying to do is replace files that have identical content with a single inode containing that content, shared between all directory entries.)
ln a tmp ; mv tmp b
is in fact the fastest way to do it atomically, as you stated in your question.
(Nitpickers corner: faster to place both system calls in one program)