I am playing with erl_driver
. Start callback of my driver is below:
ErlDrvData drv_start(ErlDrvPort port, char* command) {
char* file_name = command + sizeof(drv_name);
GenTtyData* port_data = (GenTtyData*)driver_alloc(sizeof(GenTtyData));
erl_errno = gt_open(file_name, &port_data->file);
if (erl_errno != 0) {
// Assertion there is just to show you my intention
assert(erl_errno == ENOENT);
driver_free(port_data);
return ERL_DRV_ERROR_ERRNO;
}
return port_data;
}
ErlDrvData (start)(ErlDrvPort port, char command)
This is called when the driver is instantiated, when open_port/2 is called. The driver should return a number >= 0 or a pointer, or if the driver can't be started, one of three error codes should be returned:
ERL_DRV_ERROR_GENERAL - general error, no error code
ERL_DRV_ERROR_ERRNO - error with error code in erl_errno
ERL_DRV_ERROR_BADARG - error, badarg
If an error code is returned, the port isn't started.
So I expect that erlang:open_port/2
will send exit signal containing error description (eacces
for example, or enotty
). However, in test I have
{'EXIT',
{unknown,
[{erlang,open_port,[{spawn,"gen_tty_drv non_existent.tty"},[]],[]},
{gen_tty,open,1,
[{file,
"/home/vkovalev/workspace/gen_tty_drv/_build/test/lib/gen_tty/src/gen_tty.erl"},
{line,48}]},
{gen_tty_drv_SUITE,open_non_existent_file,1,
[{file,
"/home/vkovalev/workspace/gen_tty_drv/test/gen_tty_drv_SUITE.erl"},
{line,29}]},
{test_server,ts_tc,3,[{file,"test_server.erl"},{line,1450}]},
{test_server,run_test_case_eval1,6,
[{file,"test_server.erl"},{line,1026}]},
{test_server,run_test_case_eval,9,
[{file,"test_server.erl"},{line,968}]}]}}
It seems erlang doesn't see or can't decode error reason and sends unknown
. So what's wrong with my start
callback?
This seems like a bug either in the documentation or the code. If the code that invokes the driver start
function finds that the function returns ERL_DRV_ERROR_ERRNO
, it takes the error number from errno
, not erl_errno
(this is true as of otp master commit dc35ae6c, anyway, which is roughly Erlang version 18.0-rc2; you might find it's different in later versions).
To prove this, I wrote a driver start
function that sets errno
explicitly:
static ErlDrvData
my_driver_start(ErlDrvPort port, char *command)
{
errno = ETXTBSY;
return ERL_DRV_ERROR_ERRNO;
}
and with this approach, I got the result you're seeking:
1> my_driver:start().
** exception error: etxtbsy
in function open_port/2
called as open_port({spawn,my_driver},[binary])
in call from my_driver:start/0 (my_driver.erl, line 10)
Setting erl_errno
in the same manner, though, did not produce this result. If I explicitly set errno
to a garbage value and then set erl_errno
to a valid error number, like this:
static ErlDrvData
my_driver_start(ErlDrvPort port, char *command)
{
errno = 3245690989;
erl_errno = ETXTBSY;
return ERL_DRV_ERROR_ERRNO;
}
then I get the same unknown
result as you:
1> my_driver:start().
** exception error: unknown
in function open_port/2
called as open_port({spawn,my_driver},[binary])
in call from my_driver:start/0 (my_driver.erl, line 10)
Update: I contacted a member of the OTP team about this and they replied by email that this is a documentation bug, which means using errno
rather than erl_errno
is the right solution. They said this part of the driver code has always used errno
.
Update 2: This issue has been fixed in the driver_entry
documentation as of Erlang 18.0.