If I need to generate a lambda that calls a member function. Should I capture by reference or capture this? My understanding is that & captures only the members used, but this captures all data members. Is it better to use &?
class MyClass {
public:
int mFunc() {
// accesses member variables
}
std::function<int()> get() {
//return [this] () { return this->mFunc(); };
// or
//return [&] () { return this->mFunc(); };
}
private:
// member variables
}
For the specific example you've provided, capturing by this is what you want. Conceptually, capturing this by reference doesn't make a whole lot of sense, since you can't change the value of this, you can only use it as a pointer to access members of the class or to get the address of the class instance. Inside your lambda function, if you access things which implicitly use the this pointer (e.g. you call a member function or access a member variable without explicitly using this), the compiler treats it as though you had used this anyway. You can list multiple captures too, so if you want to capture both members and local variables, you can choose independently whether to capture them by reference or by value. The following article should give you a good grounding in lambdas and captures:
https://crascit.com/2015/03/01/lambdas-for-lunch/
Also, your example uses std::function as the return type through which the lambda is passed back to the caller. Be aware that std::function isn't always as cheap as you may think, so if you are able to use a lambda directly rather than having to wrap it in a std::function, it will likely be more efficient. The following article, while not directly related to your original question, may still give you some useful material relating to lambdas and std::function (see the section An alternative way to store the function object, but the article in general may be of interest):