I'm having a problem trying to convert an HTML table into a Golang array. I've tried to achieve it using x/net/html and goquery, without any success on both of them.
Let's say we have this HTML table:
<html>
<body>
<table>
<tr>
<td>Row 1, Content 1</td>
<td>Row 1, Content 2</td>
<td>Row 1, Content 3</td>
<td>Row 1, Content 4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Row 2, Content 1</td>
<td>Row 2, Content 2</td>
<td>Row 2, Content 3</td>
<td>Row 2, Content 4</td>
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
And I'd like to end up with this array:
------------------------------------
|Row 1, Content 1| Row 1, Content 2|
------------------------------------
|Row 2, Content 1| Row 2, Content 2|
------------------------------------
As you guy can see, I'm just ignoring Contents 3 and 4.
My extraction code:
func extractValue(content []byte) {
doc, _ := goquery.NewDocumentFromReader(bytes.NewReader(content))
doc.Find("table tr td").Each(func(i int, td *goquery.Selection) {
// ...
})
}
I've tried to add a controller number which would be responsible for ignoring the <td> that I don't want to convert and calling
td.NextAll()
but with no luck. Do you guys have any idea of what should I do to accomplish it?
Thanks.
You can get away with package golang.org/x/net/html only.
var body = strings.NewReader(`
<html>
<body>
<table>
<tr>
<td>Row 1, Content 1</td>
<td>Row 1, Content 2</td>
<td>Row 1, Content 3</td>
<td>Row 1, Content 4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Row 2, Content 1</td>
<td>Row 2, Content 2</td>
<td>Row 2, Content 3</td>
<td>Row 2, Content 4</td>
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>`)
func main() {
z := html.NewTokenizer(body)
content := []string{}
// While have not hit the </html> tag
for z.Token().Data != "html" {
tt := z.Next()
if tt == html.StartTagToken {
t := z.Token()
if t.Data == "td" {
inner := z.Next()
if inner == html.TextToken {
text := (string)(z.Text())
t := strings.TrimSpace(text)
content = append(content, t)
}
}
}
}
// Print to check the slice's content
fmt.Println(content)
}
This code is written only for this typical HTML pattern only, but refactoring it to be more general wouldn't be hard.