What is the difference between atol() & strtol()?
According to their man pages, they seem to have the same effect as well as matching arguments:
long atol(const char *nptr);
long int strtol(const char *nptr, char **endptr, int base);
In a generalized case, when I don't want to use the base argument (I just have decimal numbers), which function should I use?
strtol provides you with more flexibility, as it can actually tell you if the whole string was converted to an integer or not. atol, when unable to convert the string to a number (like in atol("help")), returns 0, which is indistinguishable from atol("0"):
int main()
{
int res_help = atol("help");
int res_zero = atol("0");
printf("Got from help: %d, from zero: %d\n", res_help, res_zero);
return 0;
}
Outputs:
Got from help: 0, from zero: 0
strtol will specify, using its endptr argument, where the conversion failed.
int main()
{
char* end;
int res_help = strtol("help", &end, 10);
if (!*end)
printf("Converted successfully\n");
else
printf("Conversion error, non-convertible part: %s", end);
return 0;
}
Outputs:
Conversion error, non-convertible part: help
Therefore, for any serious programming, I definitely recommend using strtol. It's a bit more tricky to use but this has a good reason, as I explained above.
atol may be suitable only for very simple and controlled cases.