I am trying to generate a pact between 2 of our services using pact-JVM. But when I try to run the Java class, I get this exception.
1) I suspect something is wrong with the Pact body, is that correct? There is an extra 'message' parameter in the JSON body of the PactDslWithProvider,but in the runTest1() method, I am equating only the lists and when I inspect the results, they are same to me. 2) Is it correct to provide the actual provider URL in the runTest1() method? (the provider is already in place)
au.com.dius.pact.consumer.PactMismatchesException: The following requests were not received:
method: GET
path: /devices/v1
query: [externalId:[0942dc67-35de-44f7-a061-743f59436a98]]
headers: [:]
matchers: MatchingRules(rules=[:])
generators: Generators(categories={})
body: OptionalBody(state=MISSING, value=null)
Below is my Java class
public class PactForDevice {
Map<String, String> headers = MapUtils.putAll(new HashMap<String, String>(), new String[]{"Content-Type", "application/json;charset=UTF-8"});
@Rule
public PactProviderRuleMk2 provider = new PactProviderRuleMk2("device-service-m", this);
@Pact(consumer = "device-r", provider = "device-service-m")
public RequestResponsePact createFragment(PactDslWithProvider builder) {
return builder
.given("Device M details")
.uponReceiving("retrieving Device details")
.path("/devices/v1")
.method("GET")
.query("externalId=0942dc67-35de-44f7-a061-743f59436a98")
.willRespondWith()
.headers(headers)
.status(200)
.body("{" +
"\"data\": [,\n " +
"{ \n" +
" \"dateRegistered\": \"2017-07-13T11:10:51.000+12:00\",\n" +
" \"alias\": \"\",\n" +
" \"id\": \"a02b14ee72192ab3\",\n" +
" \"description\": \"Samsung SM-G930F\",\n" +
" \"title\": \"a02b14ee72192ab3\",\n" +
" \"externalId\": \"0942dc67-35de-44f7-a061-743f59436a98\"\n" +
"},\n" +
"{\n" +
" \"dateRegistered\": \"2017-07-13T10:45:51.000+12:00\",\n" +
" \"alias\": \"\",\n" +
" \"id\": \"a41c3af56ec35874\",\n" +
" \"description\": \"Samsung SM-T819\",\n" +
" \"title\": \"a41c3af56ec35874\",\n" +
" \"externalId\": \"0942dc67-35de-44f7-a061-743f59436a98\"\n" +
" },\n" +
" {\n" +
" \"dateRegistered\": \"2017-07-13T10:45:31.000+12:00\",\n" +
" \"alias\": \"\",\n" +
" \"id\": \"bd2b027bbd0a2f17\",\n" +
" \"description\": \"Samsung SM-A320Y\",\n" +
" \"title\": \"bd2b027bbd0a2f17\",\n" +
" \"externalId\": \"0942dc67-35de-44f7-a061-743f59436a98\"\n" +
" }\n" +
"],\n" +
" \"message\": \"3 devices found for the user 0942dc67-35de-44f7-a061-743f59436a98\"\n" +
"}")
.toPact();
}
@PactVerification("device-service-m")
@Test
@JsonIgnoreProperties(ignoreUnknown = true)
public void runTest1() throws IOException {
final GetDevicesResponse deviceResponse = new GetDevicesResponse();
final List<Device> deviceList = new ArrayList<>();
Device dev = new Device();
dev.withDateRegistered("2017-07-13T11:10:51.000+12:00");
dev.withAlias("");
dev.withId("a02b14ee72192ab3");
dev.withDescription("Samsung SM-G930F");
dev.withTitle("a02b14ee72192ab3");
dev.withExternalId("0942dc67-35de-44f7-a061-743f59436a98");
deviceList.add(dev);
Device dev1 = new Device();
dev1.withDateRegistered("2017-07-13T10:45:51.000+12:00");
dev1.withAlias("");
dev1.withId("a41c3af56ec35874");
dev1.withDescription("Samsung SM-T819");
dev1.withTitle("a41c3af56ec35874");
dev1.withExternalId("0942dc67-35de-44f7-a061-743f59436a98");
deviceList.add(dev1);
Device dev2 = new Device();
dev2.withDateRegistered("2017-07-13T10:45:31.000+12:00");
dev2.withAlias("");
dev2.withId("bd2b027bbd0a2f17");
dev2.withDescription("Samsung SM-A320Y");
dev2.withTitle("bd2b027bbd0a2f17");
dev2.withExternalId("0942dc67-35de-44f7-a061-743f59436a98");
deviceList.add(dev2);
deviceResponse.setDevices(deviceList);
final RestTemplate restTemplate = new RestTemplate();
GetDevicesResponse devices = restTemplate.getForObject("http://localhost:8091/devices/v1?externalId=0942dc67-35de-44f7-a061-743f59436a98", GetDevicesResponse.class);
assertThat(devices, sameBeanAs(deviceResponse));
}
}
EDIT:
I just found that if I comment out @Rule part, the test is getting passed - but a pact file is not getting generated. Shouod I explicitly specify a "pact" folder for that?
I had a similar issue with pacts not being generated after the test would run. I never got them to work using the annotation approach, instead I solved it by extending ConsumerPactTestMk2. Pact will setup the mockserver and mock the response for you.
public class PactForDevice extends ConsumerPactTestMk2 {
Map<String, String> headers = MapUtils.putAll(new HashMap<String, String>(), new String[]{"Content-Type", "application/json;charset=UTF-8"});
public RequestResponsePact createPact(PactDslWithProvider builder) {
return builder
.given("Device M details")
.uponReceiving("retrieving Device details")
.path("/devices/v1")
.method("GET")
.query("externalId=0942dc67-35de-44f7-a061-743f59436a98")
.willRespondWith()
.headers(headers)
.status(200)
.body("{" +
"\"data\": [,\n " +
"{ \n" +
" \"dateRegistered\": \"2017-07-13T11:10:51.000+12:00\",\n" +
" \"alias\": \"\",\n" +
" \"id\": \"a02b14ee72192ab3\",\n" +
" \"description\": \"Samsung SM-G930F\",\n" +
" \"title\": \"a02b14ee72192ab3\",\n" +
" \"externalId\": \"0942dc67-35de-44f7-a061-743f59436a98\"\n" +
"},\n" +
"{\n" +
" \"dateRegistered\": \"2017-07-13T10:45:51.000+12:00\",\n" +
" \"alias\": \"\",\n" +
" \"id\": \"a41c3af56ec35874\",\n" +
" \"description\": \"Samsung SM-T819\",\n" +
" \"title\": \"a41c3af56ec35874\",\n" +
" \"externalId\": \"0942dc67-35de-44f7-a061-743f59436a98\"\n" +
" },\n" +
" {\n" +
" \"dateRegistered\": \"2017-07-13T10:45:31.000+12:00\",\n" +
" \"alias\": \"\",\n" +
" \"id\": \"bd2b027bbd0a2f17\",\n" +
" \"description\": \"Samsung SM-A320Y\",\n" +
" \"title\": \"bd2b027bbd0a2f17\",\n" +
" \"externalId\": \"0942dc67-35de-44f7-a061-743f59436a98\"\n" +
" }\n" +
"],\n" +
" \"message\": \"3 devices found for the user 0942dc67-35de-44f7-a061-743f59436a98\"\n" +
"}")
.toPact();
}
@Override
protected String providerName() {
return "device-service-m";
}
@Override
protected String consumerName() {
return "device-r";
}
@Override
protected void runTest(MockServer mockServer) throws IOException {
final GetDevicesResponse deviceResponse = new GetDevicesResponse();
final List<Device> deviceList = new ArrayList<>();
Device dev = new Device();
dev.withDateRegistered("2017-07-13T11:10:51.000+12:00");
dev.withAlias("");
dev.withId("a02b14ee72192ab3");
dev.withDescription("Samsung SM-G930F");
dev.withTitle("a02b14ee72192ab3");
dev.withExternalId("0942dc67-35de-44f7-a061-743f59436a98");
deviceList.add(dev);
Device dev1 = new Device();
dev1.withDateRegistered("2017-07-13T10:45:51.000+12:00");
dev1.withAlias("");
dev1.withId("a41c3af56ec35874");
dev1.withDescription("Samsung SM-T819");
dev1.withTitle("a41c3af56ec35874");
dev1.withExternalId("0942dc67-35de-44f7-a061-743f59436a98");
deviceList.add(dev1);
Device dev2 = new Device();
dev2.withDateRegistered("2017-07-13T10:45:31.000+12:00");
dev2.withAlias("");
dev2.withId("bd2b027bbd0a2f17");
dev2.withDescription("Samsung SM-A320Y");
dev2.withTitle("bd2b027bbd0a2f17");
dev2.withExternalId("0942dc67-35de-44f7-a061-743f59436a98");
deviceList.add(dev2);
deviceResponse.setDevices(deviceList);
String url = mockServer.getUrl();
String path = "devices/v1";
String query = "externalId=0942dc67-35de-44f7-a061-743f59436a98";
URIBuilder uriBuilder = null;
try {
uriBuilder = new URIBuilder(url)
.setPath(path)
.setQuery(query);
} catch (URISyntaxException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
GetDevicesResponse devices = new ObjectMapper().readValue(Request.Get(uriBuilder.toString())
.addHeader("content-type", "application/json")
.execute().returnContent().asString(), GetDevicesResponse.class);
assertThat(devices, sameBeanAs(deviceResponse));
}
}
With this approach I had to add google guava 19 to my pom. But it works good.
<dependency>
<groupId>com.google.guava</groupId>
<artifactId>guava</artifactId>
<version>19.0</version>
</dependency>