javahibernateannotationsrelationship

Hibernate annotations. @Where vs @WhereJoinTable


Following java doc

@Where

Where clause to add to the element Entity or target entity of a collection. The clause is written in SQL. A common use case here is for soft-deletes.

@WhereJoinTable

Where clause to add to the collection join table. The clause is written in SQL. Just as with {@link Where}, a common use case is for implementing soft-deletes.

It seems annotations can be used in same way in general:

|---------------------|-------------------|-------------------|
|                     |@Where             | @WhereTable       |
|---------------------|-------------------|-------------------|
|target elements      |TYPE, METHOD, FIELD|TYPE, METHOD, FIELD|
|---------------------|-------------------|-------------------|
|Retention            |RUNTIME            |RUNTIME            |
|---------------------|-------------------|-------------------|
|properties           |clause             |clause             |
|---------------------|-------------------|-------------------|

And as result I've been really confused how I should know which annotation I should use for Relation field. I can't find difference between using of @Where and @WhereJoinTable. Both of them can replace each other, am I right?


Solution

  • First annotation is applied on target entity. Here is very simplified example of this case in pseudo code:

    @Entity
    public class Role {
        private Long id;
        private boolean enabled;
    }     
    
    @Entity
    public class User {
        @OneToMany(fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
        @JoinTable(name = "USER_ROLE", joinColumns = @JoinColumn(name = "USER_ID"), inverseJoinColumns = @JoinColumn(name = "ROLE_ID"))
        @Where(clause = "enabled = true")
        private Set<Role> roles = new LinkedHashSet<>(0);
    }
    

    As result only enabled roles will be populated from the database into User.roles collections.

    Second annotation is applied on the association table. Below is another example in pseudo-code, but now we suppose that association table is not that trivial as in first case:

    @Entity
    public class Role {
        private Long id;
        private boolean enabled;
    }   
    
    @Entity
    public class User {
        @OneToMany(fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
        @JoinTable(name = "USER_ROLE", joinColumns = @JoinColumn(name = "USER_ID"), inverseJoinColumns = @JoinColumn(name = "ROLE_ID"))
        @Where(clause = "enabled = true")
        @WhereJoinTable(clause = "now() between valid_from and valid_until")
        private Set<Role> roles = new LinkedHashSet<>(0);
    }
    
    and association table has validity attributes, something like 
    
    CREATE TABLE USER_ROLE {
        ID NUMBER NOT NULL,
        USER_ID NUMBER NOT NULL,
        ROLE_ID NUMBER NOT NULL,
        VALID_FROM DATETIME,
        VALID_UNTIL DATETIME
    } 
    

    As result only enabled and valid roles will be populated from the database into User.roles collections.