Currently I have the following code to expose react-intl to non-components, but it throws an error for intl as undefined.
I have created a separate component as 'CurrentLocale' and inject-intl to it. The exporting function t will use intl formatMessage from CurrentLocale context.
import React from 'react';
import {injectIntl} from 'react-intl';
import PropTypes from 'prop-types';
import { flow } from 'lodash';
class CurrentLocale extends React.Component {
constructor(props,context){
super();
console.log(context,props);
console.log(this.formatMessage);
const { intl } = this.context.intl;//this.props;
this.formatMessage = intl.formatMessage;
}
render() {
return false;
}
}
CurrentLocale.contextTypes={
intl:PropTypes.object,
};
injectIntl(CurrentLocale);
function intl() {
return new CurrentLocale();
}
function formatMessage(...args) {
return intl().formatMessage(...args);
}
const t = opts => {
const id = opts.id;
const type = opts.type;
const values = opts.values;
let t;
switch (type){
case 'message':
default:
t = formatMessage(id, values);
}
return t;
}
export default t;
t is called as in another plain javascript file as,
import t from './locale/t';
t( { type: 'message', id:'button.Next'});
This line: const { intl } = this.context.intl;
should be const { intl } = this.context;
Here is a reference post of someone doing almost the exact same thing as you are: https://github.com/yahoo/react-intl/issues/983#issuecomment-342314143
In the above the author is creating essentially a singleton that is exported instead of creating a new instance each time like you have above. This might be something you want to consider as well.