I understand that Python built-in types have a "truthiness" value, and the empty string is considered False
, while any non-empty string is considered True
.
I can check this using the built-in function bool
.
>>> bool("")
False
>>> bool("dog")
True
I can also make use of these truthiness values when using conditionals. For example:
>>> if "dog":
... print("yes")
...
yes
This doesn't work with the ==
operator though:
>>> "dog" == True
False
>>> "dog" == False
False
Can anyone explain why ==
seems to act differently than a conditional?
See the truth value testing and comparisons sections of the documentation, excerpted below.
In a nutshell, most things are truthy by default, which is why bool("dog")
is true. The ==
operator compares two objects for equality, as opposed to comparing their truthinesses, as I assume you had expected.
4.1. Truth Value Testing
Any object can be tested for truth value, for use in an if or while condition or as operand of the Boolean operations below.
By default, an object is considered true unless its class defines either a
__bool__()
method that returns False or a__len__()
method that returns zero, when called with the object.Here are most of the built-in objects considered false:
- constants defined to be false:
None
andFalse
- zero of any numeric type:
0
,0.0
,0j
,Decimal(0)
,Fraction(0, 1)
- empty sequences and collections:
''
,()
,[]
,{}
,set()
,range(0)
Operations and built-in functions that have a Boolean result always return 0 or False for false and 1 or True for true, unless otherwise stated. (Important exception: the Boolean operations
or
andand
always return one of their operands.)4.3. Comparisons
Objects of different types, except different numeric types, never compare equal.
...
Non-identical instances of a class normally compare as non-equal unless the class defines the
__eq__()
method.