I have some 'n' experimental curves for the same experimental conditions. Due to the inherent thermal drift in the system, the data sets are not exactly aligned with each other. I am looking for a robust algorithm that would align the data-curves for me.
This is what I tried so far:
x = linspace(1,100,1000);
y = tanh(0.09*x) ; figure; plot(x,y)
y1 = tanh(0.09*(x+10)) ; hold on; plot(x,y1)
y2 = tanh(0.09*(x-10)) ; hold on; plot(x,y2)
The curves look like this:
and this is what I would like to get:
(Here I have aligned the curves y1
and y2
on top of the curve y
)
I thought cross-correlation might help me align the data. So I tried:
[cc,lag] = xcorr(y,y1,'none');
[~,ind] = max(cc);
sh = lag(ind);
But this gave me sh=0
.
Is there a better way of doing this?
Here's my idea on how to approach this, using "reverse" interpolation (reverse in the sense that usually we want to find y
values that correspond to some x
, but here it's the other way around):
function q51282667
%% Generate data:
x = linspace(1,100,1000);
y{1} = tanh(0.09*x) ;
y{2} = tanh(0.09*(x+10));
y{3} = tanh(0.09*(x-10));
% ^ y,y1,y2 are not necessarily the same length so I used a cell and not a numeric array
%% Find alignment:
% Establish a baseline: the curve with the largest vertical extent:
[~,mxi] = sort(cellfun(@max,y) - cellfun(@min,y), 'descend');
% Reverse interpolation using y-values:
ny = numel(y);
deltaX = zeros(ny,1);
for indY = 1:ny
deltaX(indY) = interp1(y{mxi(1)}, x, y{indY}(1)) - x(1);
end
%% Plot:
% Original:
figure(); plot(x, y{1}, x, y{2}, x, y{3}); % this is the same as your example
% Shifted:
figure(); plot(x + deltaX(mxi(1)), y{mxi(1)}, ...
x + deltaX(mxi(2)), y{mxi(2)}, ...
x + deltaX(mxi(3)), y{mxi(3)});
resulting in:
deltaX =
10.0000063787562
20.0000993310027
0
and: