Testing a view with a Filterrific form in rspec fails with the following error:
1) members/index renders a list of members
Failure/Error: <%= form_for_filterrific @filterrific do |f| %>
ActionView::Template::Error:
No route matches {:action=>"index", :controller=>"test"}
# /home/spfolly/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.3.0/gems/filterrific-5.0.1/lib/filterrific/action_view_extension.rb:19:in `form_for_filterrific'
# ./app/views/members/index.html.erb:20:in `_app_views_members_index_html_erb__4554187109976153340_52575240'
# ./spec/views/members/index.html.erb_spec.rb:42:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'
# ------------------
# --- Caused by: ---
# ActionController::UrlGenerationError:
# No route matches {:action=>"index", :controller=>"test"}
# /home/spfolly/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.3.0/gems/filterrific-5.0.1/lib/filterrific/action_view_extension.rb:19:in `form_for_filterrific'
Is the controller name 'test' a quirk of rspec? Do I need a 'test' route just for Filterrific rspec tests?
How can I fix this error?
Solved. https://github.com/jhund/filterrific/issues/159
"After running into this same problem, just found it can be solved by stubbing the controller_name method on ActionView::TestCase::TestController.
Why: Rspec uses ActionView::TestCase::TestController as a generic controller for all view tests, hence the :controller=>"test" reported above. (Note: Rspec does consider namespaces. For example, if your view is located under a namespace of "admin", then the error will say no route matches :controller=>"admin/test".) Filterrific simply uses the controller's name by calling controller.controller_name (see https://github.com/jhund/filterrific/blob/master/lib/filterrific/action_view_extension.rb#L20). So in Rspec view tests, it's setting the controller name to "test". To get your test to pass you can stub controller_name to return a different value.
Example: This is a complete example of how I set up my Rspec view test. Only the first line is necessary to fix the problem described in this Issue, but I thought I'd include the rest because there doesn't seem to be much information online about testing code where Filterrific is in use.
before(:each) do
allow_any_instance_of(ActionView::TestCase::TestController).to receive(:controller_name).and_return('members') # CUSTOMIZE THIS; Fixes the "No route matches" problem
@filterrific = Filterrific::ParamSet.new(User, {})
@filterrific.select_options = {
filter_role: User.filter_role_options,
filter_status: User.filter_status_options,
}
@users = [ build_stubbed(:user) ]
end