Let's say I want to I download 10,000 files. I can easily build a queue of those 10,000 files (happy to take advice if any of this can be done better),
import request from 'request-promise-native';
import {from} from 'rxjs';
let reqs = [];
for ( let i = 0; i < 10000; i++ ) {
reqs.push(
from(request(`http://bleh.com/${i}`))
)
};
Now I have an array of Rx.JS observable I've created from promises that represent my queue. Now for the behavior of what I want, I want to issue
I can create a solution to this problem, but in light of things like the Rxjs queue, which I've never used I'm wondering what the right-most Rxjs way to do this is.
It sounds like you want an equivalent of forkJoin
that supports a caller-specified maximum number of concurrent subscriptions.
It's possible to re-implement forkJoin
using mergeMap
and to expose the concurrent
parameter, like this:
import { from, Observable } from "rxjs";
import { last, map, mergeMap, toArray } from "rxjs/operators";
export function forkJoinConcurrent<T>(
observables: Observable<T>[],
concurrent: number
): Observable<T[]> {
// Convert the array of observables to a higher-order observable:
return from(observables).pipe(
// Merge each of the observables in the higher-order observable
// into a single stream:
mergeMap((observable, observableIndex) => observable.pipe(
// Like forkJoin, we're interested only in the last value:
last(),
// Combine the value with the index so that the stream of merged
// values - which could be in any order - can be sorted to match
// the order of the source observables:
map(value => ({ index: observableIndex, value }))
), concurrent),
// Convert the stream of last values to an array:
toArray(),
// Sort the array of value/index pairs by index - so the value
// indices correspond to the source observable indices and then
// map the pair to the value:
map(pairs => pairs.sort((l, r) => l.index - r.index).map(pair => pair.value))
);
}