I have an API endpoint which, when called with GET, returns an array of JSON objects in the body, like this:
[
{"id": "321", "created": "2019-03-01", "updated": "2019-03-15"},
{"id": "123", "created": "2019-03-02", "updated": "2019-03-16"}
]
I would like to check the body with a Spring MockMvc test case. The statement currently looks like this:
mockMvc.perform(get("/myapi/v1/goodstuff").
andExpect(status().isOk()).
andExpect(content().contentType(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON_UTF8)).
andExpect(jsonPath("$.*", isA(ArrayList.class))).
andExpect(jsonPath("$.*", hasSize(2))).
andExpect(jsonPath("$[0].id", is("321"))).
andExpect(jsonPath("$[0].created", is("2019-03-01"))).
andExpect(jsonPath("$[0].updated*", is("2019-03-15"))).
andExpect(jsonPath("$[1].id", is("1232"))).
andExpect(jsonPath("$[1].created", is("2019-03-02"))).
andExpect(jsonPath("$[1].updated*", is("2019-03-16")));
However, the implementation of my API doesn't guarantee the order of JSON object in the returned array.
Were this an array of strings, I would solve this via matcher generated by org.hamcrest.collection.IsIterableContainingInAnyOrder<T>.containsInAnyOrder
.
But I cannot see any suitable matcher for my situation in their doc, nor any clue in the description of jsonPath
method in Spring docs
From a quick search I didn't manage find anything related to my situation on SO, either, beyond a list of strings situation I described above. Of course, I could convert JSON objects to strings.
But I'm wondering, could I solve this problem for a list of JSON objects, comparing each of the fields of each objects one-by-one (like shown in the code snippet above), but ignoring the order of objects in the collection?
Update: Zgurskyi has suggested a solution that helps with my original simplified example. However, with a real-life practical example there are 2 more inputs:
is
, for instance:(a bit closer to my original code)
mockMvc.perform(get("/myapi/v1/greatstuff").
andExpect(status().isOk()).
andExpect(content().contentType(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON_UTF8)).
andExpect(jsonPath("$.*", isA(ArrayList.class))).
andExpect(jsonPath("$.*", hasSize(2))).
andExpect(jsonPath("$[0].id", is("321"))).
andExpect(jsonPath("$[0].did", anything())).
andExpect(jsonPath("$[0].createdTs", startsWith("2019-03-01"))).
andExpect(jsonPath("$[0].updatedTs", startsWith("2019-03-15"))).
andExpect(jsonPath("$[0].name", equalToIgnoringCase("wat"))).
andExpect(jsonPath("$[0].stringValues", containsInAnyOrder("a","b","c"))).
andExpect(jsonPath("$[1].id", is("1232"))).
andExpect(jsonPath("$[1].did", anything())).
andExpect(jsonPath("$[1].createdTs", startsWith("2019-03-01"))).
andExpect(jsonPath("$[1].updatedTs", startsWith("2019-03-15"))).
andExpect(jsonPath("$[1].name", equalToIgnoringCase("taw"))).
andExpect(jsonPath("$[1].stringValues", containsInAnyOrder("d","e","f"))).
andReturn();
So far it seems that I can't do anything better than implementing my own matcher class.
Or...can I?
You can assert list items fields ignoring order:
.andExpect(jsonPath("$[*].id", containsInAnyOrder("321", "123")))
.andExpect(jsonPath("$[*].created", containsInAnyOrder("2019-03-01", "2019-03-02")))
.andExpect(jsonPath("$[*].updated", containsInAnyOrder("2019-03-15", "2019-03-16")))
Another approach would be to check that specific list items exist in response:
.andExpect(jsonPath("$.[?(@.id == 123 && @.created == \"2019-03-02\" && @.updated == \"2019-03-16\")]").exists())
.andExpect(jsonPath("$.[?(@.id == 321 && @.created == \"2019-03-01\" && @.updated == \"2019-03-15\")]").exists())