javaandroidcd

Why Android used Java concept instead of D language or C or C++? But Chromium web browser is in C++, its very complicated match


Android is 32-bit ARM. wiki

Description:

1) So, 32/64 or 8/12/16 Bit compiler is available with D language if not it can be builded by a compiler, if i am not wrong?

2) Linux standard kernel: Libraries written in C and other languages can be compiled to ARM wtih D language i believe, not only D language also possible with C/C++.

According to Android wiki information starts my confusion:

Question: Why just Android is not written either with D or C/C++ languages? Instead of dealing with all those mess, this is the only company proved that Bigtable they needed (world cant solve there issue yet) and Mobile platform also requires changes such as Android? Whats wrong with iPhone/Nokia implementation then?

Question: Why Android dont run JVM but they build a Java concept does alternative JVM processing, instead of doing same such as MeeGo or others. Is that a marketing terms or is that a technical term? Can it not be written in C/C++ or D language only the whole Android? Instead of involving Java concept or Mess concepts?

if yes then Chromium-web browser why they used again C++? Why not just followed Java also for Chromium-web?

Its all about to learn how its getting used in practical life, to me again, its just to know why they did such mess for Android? Are we then learning programming languages in University wrong way (knowing later, oh Big Google just used Java for Android) ?

Thanks in advance, for your valuable advise on this.


Solution

  • Why just Android is not written either with D or C/C++ languages?

    Because none of them is a fully managed language. D is garbage collected, but you can also do manual memory management ... with all of the risks that that entails.

    Also, because starting from a Java base (in the form of Apache Harmony, etc) meant that:

    However, as @Marchy points out, it wasn't Google that made the original decision:

    "... Google didn't BUILD Android. [Android Inc] was a startup they bought, and as a startup you use whatever is out there and optimize to gain momentum FAST and with VERY limited resources. ..."

    Though obviously Google did have a hand, since (according to Wikipedia) Google helped finance Android Inc prior to the buyout.

    Why Android dont run JVM but they build a Java concept does alternative JVM processing.

    Ultimately, because the restrictions that Sun / Oracle places on the Java language and platform would have made it impossible to innovate in the way Google has done with Android. Specifically, Sun / Oracle won't license vendors to implement Java SE on mobile platforms.

    Are we then learning programming languages in University wrong way.

    Maybe you did!!

    But when I learned programming at University, it was in the full knowledge that I'd never use some of the languages I was taught about. For instance, I've never used Algol-60, Simula-67, SNOBOL or CDC assembly language since. But that did not invalidate the reasons that they were taught, or the valuable lessons I gained in learning them.