I want to submit a PR to a github-hosted project (timeshift) that uses po and pot files for translation. I have never encountered these before. One of my changes is to UI (this is backup software and I've added an option to skip jobs when the machine is on battery).
The .pot file appears to be the 'master'. It is generated by a script, it seems. My change has been detected and correctly two strings have been added to the .pot file.
the script to make the project then generates a lot of .po files, and they are changed. I suppose this is unavoidable and correct, since I have added two strings that need translation.
However, they are all committed and part of my pull request. This doesn't seem right, because any changes to translations before my PR is reviewed are then going to require merging, it looks like a lot of work, and I suppose/guess that the project developer does not want to concern himself with translations very much.
Is this just the way it is, or is there a workflow I don't know about? Should I somehow avoid marking my string changes for translation, and then make that a second PR, to keep my logic changes separated from the noise of translation?
I have not had any response from the project developer.
2019: For your PR branch, you do not need to commit the .po files. As you have found, they will be regenerated from the Makefile, and can be committed by the one integrating your PR.
Once your PR integrated (with the generated .po
files updated), you can rebase your working branch, and get said updated .po
files then.
Incidentally, The Git project itself has to deal with this workflow, and recently changed it.
With Git 2.37 (Q3 2022), a workflow change for translators are being proposed.
See commit e2f4045, commit b9832f7, commit 5377abc, commit 6dd9a91, commit 1cc0425 (26 May 2022) by Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason (avar
).
See commit fbb3d32, commit e448263, commit 15fe406, commit 9f55578, commit ea3f639 (26 May 2022) by Jiang Xin (jiangxin
).
(Merged by Junio C Hamano -- gitster
-- in commit 28db3b7, 03 Jun 2022)
po/git.pot
: don't check in result of "make pot"Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
Signed-off-by: Jiang Xin
Remove the "
po/git.pot
" file from being tracked, which started with dce37b6 ("l10n
: initial git.pot for 1.7.10 upcoming release", 2012-02-13, Git v1.7.10-rc0 -- merge).The reason the
po/git.pot
started being checked in was because thepo/*.po
files were changed a schema where we'd generate them from a known-good snapshot ofpo/git.pot
, instead of each translator running "make pot
" themselves.This makes sense, but we don't need to carry this file in-tree just to achieve that aim, and doing so has resulted in a significant amount of "diff churn" since this method of doing it was introduced:
$ git log -p --oneline -- po/git.pot|wc -l 553743
We can instead let l10n contributors to generate "
po/git.pot
" in runtime to update their own "po/XX.po
", and the l10n coordinator can check pull requests using CI pipeline.This reverts to the schema introduced initially in cd5513a (
i18n
: Makefile: , 2011-02-22, Git v1.7.5-rc0 -- merge) (i18n: Makefile: "pot
" target to extract messages marked for translation, 2011-02-22).