c++initializationvalue-initializationcopy-initializationdefault-initialization

What is the difference between default-initialization and copy-initialization for classes?


Given the following code:

class temp
{
public:
    string str;
    int num;
};

int main()
{
    temp temp1;
    temp temp2 = temp();

    cout << temp1.str << endl; //Print ""
    cout << temp2.str << endl; //Print ""

    cout << temp1.num << endl; //Print a rand num
    cout << temp2.num << endl; //Print 0
}

What is the difference between default-initialization —

temp temp1;

and copy-initialization with value-initialization

temp temp2 = temp();

Solution

  • temp temp1;
    

    This calls temp's default constructor on the instance called temp1.

    temp temp2 = temp();
    

    This calls temp's default constructor on a temporary object, then calls the compiler-generated copy-constructor on temp2 with the temporary object as the argument (this of course assumes that the compiler doesn't elide copies; it depends on your compiler's optimization settings).

    As for why you get different initialized values, section 8.5 of the standard is relevant:


    8.5 Initializers [dcl.init]

    Paragraph 5:

    To zero-initialize an object of type T means:

    To default-initialize an object of type T means:

    To value-initialize an object of type T means:

    Paragraph 7:

    An object whose initializer is an empty set of parentheses, i.e., (), shall be value-initialized.

    Paragraph 9:

    If no initializer is specified for an object, and the object is of (possibly cv-qualified) non-POD class type (or array thereof), the object shall be default-initialized; if the object is of const-qualified type, the underlying class type shall have a user-declared default constructor. Otherwise, if no initializer is specified for a nonstatic object, the object and its subobjects, if any, have an indeterminate initial value; if the object or any of its subobjects are of const-qualified type, the program is ill-formed.

    12 Special Member Functions [special]

    Paragraph 7:

    An implicitly-declared default constructor for a class is implicitly defined when it is used to create an object of its class type (1.8). The implicitly-defined default constructor performs the set of initializations of the class that would be performed by a user-written default constructor for that class with an empty mem-initializer-list (12.6.2) and an empty function body.

    12.6.2 Initializing bases and members [class.base.init]

    Paragraph 4:

    If a given nonstatic data member or base class is not named by a mem-initializer-id (including the case where there is no mem-initializer-list because the constructor has no ctor-initializer), then


    So now that the rules have been laid out, let's see how they apply:

    temp temp1;
    

    temp is a non-POD type (because it has a std::string member), and since no initializer is specified for temp1, it will be default-initialized (8.5/9). This calls the default constructor (8.5/5). temp has an implicit default constructor (12/7) which default-initializes the std::string member and the int member isn't initialized at all (12.6.2/4).

    temp temp2 = temp();
    

    On the other hand, the temporary temp object is value-initialized (8.5/7), which value-initializes all data members (8.5/5), which calls the default constructor in the std::string member and zero-initializes the int member (8.5/5).

    Of course, if you much rather not have to refer to the standard in 5+ different places, just ensure that you explicitly initialize everything (e.g. int i = 0; or using initializer lists).