I was writing some tests for some legacy code that validates a user's date of birth. I encounter the following method in the class. My doubt is that whether the if statement in the try block is necessary. From my understanding, if the parse function returns a LocalDate object successfully, then date.toString() should always equal to the input dobstr, and there's no need to do an additional check. Am I missing anything? I could not think of any case that we need this extra check. Please help. Thanks!
private LocalDate format(String dobStr) throws Exception {
LocalDate date = null;
try {
date = LocalDate.parse(dobStr, DateTimeFormatter.ISO_DATE);
if (!dobStr.equals(date.toString())) {
throw new DateTimeParseException("some message");
}
}
catch (DateTimeParseException ex) {
throw ex;
}
return date;
}
this is what I found in the source code for DateTimeFormatter.ISO_DATE
public static final DateTimeFormatter ISO_DATE;
static {
ISO_DATE = new DateTimeFormatterBuilder()
.parseCaseInsensitive()
.append(ISO_LOCAL_DATE)
.optionalStart()
.appendOffsetId()
.toFormatter(ResolverStyle.STRICT, IsoChronology.INSTANCE);
}
The only reason that I could see for doing a toString()
check would be to avoid lenient issue: the parser may be lenient and try to interpret wrong values (for example: 2020-12-32 could be interpreted as 2021-01-01).
ResolverStyle.SMART
.If you want to remove it, you should check if DateTimeFormatter.ISO_DATE
is ResolverStyle.STRICT
by default or not. Assuming it is not STRICT by default, your code could be:
private LocalDate format(String dobStr) throws Exception {
return LocalDate.parse(dobStr, DateTimeFormatter.ISO_DATE.withResolverStyle(ResolverStyle.STRICT));
}