I found no information about what the enum
is over the table domain on https://code.kx.com/q/ref/enumerate/. But something interesting exists there: https://code.kx.com/q/kb/linking-columns. I tried those examples and found an enum
structure that behaves in some situations like a normal enum, but has a strange behaviour in others.
q)kt:1!t:([]a:`a`b`c;b:10 20 30)
q)tt:([]k:`a`a`a`b;d:11 21 31 41)
q)show et1:`t!t[`a]?tt[`k]
`t!0 0 0 1
q)show et2:`kt$tt[`k]
`kt$`a`a`a`b
q)meta select k,d,et1,et2 from tt
c | t f a
---| ------
k | s
d | j
et1| j t
et2| s kt
q)select r1.a, r1.b, r2.a, r2.b from update r1:et1, r2:et2 from tt
a b a1 b1
----------
a 10 a 10
a 10 a 10
a 10 a 10
b 20 b 20
From this perspective et1
and et2
both have similar behaviour. But if we check other enum
properties, we see differences:
q)et2[0]
`kt$`a
q)et2[0]:`a
q)
q)et1[0]
`t!0
q)et1[0]:0 / neither works this
't
[0] et1[0]:0
^
q)et1[0]:(`a`b!(`a;10)) / nor that
't
[0] et1[0]:(`a`b!(`a;10))
^
The situation seems more weird if we build enums for just a keyed tables: see a difference for a table with one key column and for two:
q)kkt:2!t:([]a:`a`b`c;b:10 20 30;c:11 22 33)
q)kt:1!0!kkt
q)show ekkt:`kkt$((`a;10);(`b;20);(`b;20))
`kkt!0 1 1
q)show ekt:`kt$(`a`b`b)
`kt$`a`b`b
The same hardcoded (with !
) enum notation for kkt
.
So the question: what are they? - those enums with a familiar $
and with a hardcoded !
notaions for a table? Is it possible to apply enum-extend
technique (?
) for them and how? And is there any documentation for them?
What you're seeing is the difference between a simple foreign key and a linked column. As mentioned in the documentation, differences include:
q)kt:([eid:1001 1002 1003] name:`Dent`Beeblebrox`Prefect; iq:98 42 126)
q)tdetails2:([] eid:1003 1001 1002 1001 1002 1001 777;sc:126 36 92 39 98 42 7)
q)update linker:`kt!((0!kt)`eid)?eid from `tdetails2
`tdetails2
q)select linker.name from tdetails2
name
----------
Prefect
Dent
Beeblebrox
Dent
Beeblebrox
Dent
The latter would not have been allowed for a simple foreign key.
Also I don't know why you would want to modify /edit the values of an enumeration - don't do that!