I was about to try Python package downloaded from GitHub, and realized that it did not have a setup.py
, so I could not install it with
pip install -e <folder>
Instead, the package had a pyproject.toml
file which seems to have very similar entries as the setup.py
usually has.
Googling lead me into PEP-518 and it gives some critique to setup.py
in Rationale section. However, it does not clearly tell that usage of setup.py
should be avoided, or that pyproject.toml
would as such completely replace setup.py
.
Is the pyproject.toml
something that is used to replace setup.py
? Or should a package come with both, a pyproject.toml
and a setup.py
?
How would one install a project with pyproject.toml
in an editable state?
Currently there are multiple packaging tools being popular in Python community and while setuptools
still seems to be prevalent it's not a de facto standard anymore. This situation creates a number of hassles for both end users and developers:
setuptools
-based packages installation from source / build of a distribution can fail if one doesn't have setuptools
installed;pip
doesn't support the installation of packages based on other packaging tools from source, so these tools had to generate a setup.py
file to produce a compatible package. To build a distribution package one has to install the packaging tool first and then use tool-specific commands;pyproject.toml
is a new configuration file introduced by PEP 517 and PEP 518 to solve these problems:
... think of the (rough) steps required to produce a built artifact for a project:
- The source checkout of the project.
- Installation of the build system.
- Execute the build system.
This PEP [518] covers step #2. PEP 517 covers step #3 ...
Any tool can also extend this file with its own section (table) to accept tool-specific options, but it's up to them and not required.
PEP 621 suggests using pyproject.toml
to specify package core metadata in static, tool-agnostic way. Which backends currently support this is shown in the following table:
enscons |
flit_core |
hatchling |
pdm-pep517 |
poetry-core |
setuptools |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.26.0+ |
3.2+ |
0.3+ |
0.3.0+ |
Issue #3332 |
61.0.0+ |
setup.py
?For setuptools
-based packages pyproject.toml
is not strictly meant to replace setup.py
, but rather to ensure its correct execution if it's still needed. For other packaging tools – yes, it is:
Where the
build-backend
key exists, this takes precedence and the source tree follows the format and conventions of the specified backend (as such nosetup.py
is needed unless the backend requires it). Projects may still wish to include asetup.py
for compatibility with tools that do not use this spec.
Originally "editable install" was a setuptools
-specific feature and as such it was not supported by PEP 517. Later on PEP 660 extended this concept to packages using pyproject.toml
.
There are two possible conditions for installing a package in editable mode using pip
:
pip
) and a backend must support PEP 660.pip
supports it since version 21.3;setup.py
file which supports the develop
command.pip
can also install packages using only setup.cfg
file in editable mode.The following table describes the support of editable installs by various backends: