With a class defined as follows:
template <typename T>
class A {
private:
T a;
public:
A(T& a) : a_(a) { }
template <typename D>
void Eval(D& arg)
{
// ...
}
};
template A<int>;
I want to explicitly instantiate one instance of the class, and I want this class to have one explicit instantiation of Eval. The intention here is to get a member function pointer that avoids ambiguity:
auto eval_ptr = &A<int>::Eval;
The ambiguity is not coming from anything to do with template instantiation of the class, it's caused by Eval
also being a templated function.
&A<int>::Eval
does not point to a function, it points to a template. And there is just no such type as a "pointer to a template".
If you want a pointer to A<int>::Eval
, you need to specify D
as well.
auto eval_ptr = &A<int>::Eval<int>;
works just fine for example.
Addendum: Pointers-to-templates do exist in the grammatical sense, but there is no type an object can have to hold one of them. They must be immediately casted/decayed to a specific overload in order to be used, which doesn't come into play here since you want to store it in an auto
.
For example: The following is fine because there's clearly only one "version" of Eval
that can be meant:
void bar(void (A<int>::*arg)(int&)) {}
void foo() {
bar(&A<int>::Eval);
}