Is this legal?
MANIFEST.MF for org.fragment1
(org.host
is a normal bundle, not a fragment):
Bundle-SymbolicName: org.fragment1
Fragment-Host: org.host
MANIFEST.MF for org.fragment2
:
Bundle-SymbolicName: org.fragment2
Fragment-Host: org.fragment1
Or should org.fragment2
instead have
Fragment-Host: org.host
?
Fragment bundles can't have a other fragment bundles as host. Only normal bundles can act as an fragment-host. So your third example is correct:
Or should
org.fragment2
instead have
Fragment-Host: org.host
You find this restriction in the OSGi Service Platform Release 4 Version 4.3 Core Specification on page 70. It says:
A Fragment bundle can not be required by another bundle with the Require-Bundle header.