I'm attempting to make a high resolution figure of a digital elevation model (raster), but my plots appear to have some distorted features. Here's a reproducible example:
library(elevatr)
library(raster)
library(tidyverse)
library(sp)
ext <- extent(-864434.2, -771071.7, 4019064, 4054974) %>%
as("SpatialPolygons") %>%
spsample(100, "regular")
crs(ext) <- "+proj=utm +zone=19 +ellps=GRS80 +datum=NAD83"
alt <- get_elev_raster(ext,
prj = crs(ext),
z = 11) %>%
crop(ext)
names(alt) <- "alt"
ggplot() +
geom_raster(data = as.data.frame(alt, xy = T), aes(x = x, y = y, fill = alt)) +
scale_fill_gradientn("Elevation (m)", colors = terrain.colors(256), na.value = NA) +
theme(legend.position = "none")
ggsave("gg_gsmnp_alt_test.jpeg", width = 8, height = 4, units = "in", dpi = 600)
The artifacts become more prevalent with increased resolution (if I set the z
parameter to a higher resolution, e.g. 11
or 12
, the artifacts are much more abundant).
Calculating a hill shade layer exacerbates these artifacts:
hs <- hillShade(terrain(alt, opt = "slope"),
terrain(alt, opt = "aspect"))
ggplot() +
geom_raster(data = as.data.frame(alt, xy = T), aes(x = x, y = y, fill = alt)) +
geom_raster(data = as.data.frame(hs, xy = T), aes(x = x, y = y, alpha = 1 - layer), fill = "gray20") +
scale_fill_gradientn("Elevation (m)", colors = terrain.colors(256), na.value = NA) +
scale_alpha(guide = FALSE, range = c(0,1))
ggsave("gg_gsmnp_alt_hs_test.jpeg", width = 8, height = 4, units = "in", dpi = 600)
Furthermore, if I aggregate the layer using bilinear interpolation, the artifacts predictably disappear:
alt_agg <- alt %>%
aggregate(fact = 2)
hs_agg <- hs %>%
aggregate(fact = 2)
ggplot() +
geom_raster(data = as.data.frame(alt_agg, xy = T), aes(x = x, y = y, fill = alt)) +
geom_raster(data = as.data.frame(hs_agg, xy = T), aes(x = x, y = y, alpha = 1 - layer), fill = "gray20") +
scale_fill_gradientn("Elevation (m)", colors = terrain.colors(256), na.value = NA) +
scale_alpha(guide = FALSE, range = c(0,1)) +
theme(legend.position = "none")
ggsave("gg_gsmnp_alt_hs_agg_test.jpeg", width = 8, height = 4, units = "in", dpi = 600)
While the graphical issues are minor, I'm curious if these artifacts may contribute to anomalies in data extracted from the raster. For instance, if I extract data using raster::extract
at these locations, will I receive spurious values?
Any advice or answers would be greatly appreciated.
Best,
-Alex. (he/him/his)
Better late than never... Apologies.
Root cause of this was GDAL warp when I tried to transform and moscaic at the same time. I now use two steps, mosaic, then transform. Version at https://github.com/jhollist/elevatr has the fix. I am working on a CRAN release. Hope this helps and again apologies.