According to doc.rust-lang.org
build[s] a package's documentation, using specified custom flags
build[s] a package's documentation
What is the difference between the two? From what I understand cargo rustdoc is just like cargo doc, but it allows for more lints—for instance:
#![deny(rustdoc::broken_intra_doc_links)]
Is this correct? Oddly enough, cargo rustdoc will also fail in certain situations where cargo doc doesn't. For instance
some/folder on some-branch [$!] via 🦀 v1.60.0-nightly
❯ cargo doc
Finished dev [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 0.53s
some/folder on some-branch [$!] via 🦀 v1.60.0-nightly
❯ cargo rustdoc
error: manifest path `some/folder/Cargo.toml` is a virtual manifest, but this command requires running against an actual package in this workspace
Also, cargo doc does not support adding the -D option, whereas cargo rustdoc does.
❯ cargo doc -- -D rustdoc::broken_intra_doc_links
error: Found argument '-D' which wasn't expected, or isn't valid in this context
USAGE:
cargo doc [OPTIONS]
For more information try --help
Their relationship is like between cargo build and cargo rustc: cargo doc performs all the usual work, for an entire workspace, including dependencies (by default). cargo rustdoc allows you to pass flags directly to rustdoc, and only works for a single crate.
Here is the execution code for cargo rustdoc. Here is the code for cargo doc. The only differences is that cargo rustdoc always specify to not check dependencies while cargo doc allows you to choose (by default it does, but you can specify the flag --no-deps), and that cargo rustdoc allows you to pass flags directly to rustdoc with the flags after the --.