[SOLVED] int vs size

int vs size_t vs long

I have been seeing a lot of people lately say that you should use size_t instead of int. But what is the difference? Is it always better? Or are there situations for int, and situations for size_t? Or maybe size_t is similar to long? When should I use int, when should I use size_t, and when should I use long?

Solution

Is it (size_t) always better?

Usually

int math may fail size calculation that woks with size_t math.

    int r = rand();
    int c = rand();
    char *ptr1 = malloc(r * c); // Overflow possible
    char *ptr2 = malloc((size_t) 1 * r*c); // Overflow possible, yet less likely.

int range may be (and often is) less than size_t range.

When sizeof some_object exceeds INT_MAX, following code will certainly lead to errors.

int sz = sizeof some_object;  // Problem when size is large.
// Good as
size_t sz = sizeof some_object;  // No problem for all sizeof return values.

unsigned range may be less than size_t range.

String lengths may be longer than UINT_MAX

unsigned sz = strlen(pointer_to_a_string); // Problem when length is large.
// Good as
size_t sz = strlen(pointer_to_a_string); // No problem for all values from strlen().

size_t is an unsigned type, so avoid tests like size >= 0, size < 0, size == -1.

When code decrements the size below zero, we have issues.

// Compare
int isize = sizeof object;  // Bad as size may exceed INT_MAX
while (isize >= 0) {
  ...
  isize--;
}
size_t usize = sizeof object;
while (usize >= 0) {  // Bad as usize >= 0 is _always_ true
  ...
  usize--;
}

Instead re-work code in some fashion.

size_t usize = sizeof object;
do {
  ...
} while (usize-- > 0):