Notation for multiple stereotypes
Does anyone have a ref to the UML 2.5.1 where the notation for multiple stereotypes is defined?
In EA they render «s1»,«s2» while in the spec in the only example I found it's «s1,s2»
p.267 of UML 2.5.1:
On page 641
Where multiple keywords and/or stereotype names apply, the notational options defined by 9.2.4 shall apply.
§9.2.4 states
If multiple keywords and/or stereotype names apply to the same model element, each may be enclosed in a separate pair of guillemets and listed one after the other. Alternatively they may all appear between the same pair of guillemets, separated by commas.
So it appears that both «stereo1» «stereo2» as «stereo1,stereo2» are allowed.
«stereo1»,«stereo2» does not appear to be allowed by the UML specs as it only mentions the comma's in case all stereotypes are enclosed in a single set of guillemets.
Sparx Enterprise Architect (v 15.2) seems to render it correctly:
- Implicit and explicit conversion of pointers to const objects in C
- asctime - day of month zero or space padded?
- If an enum declared in a namespace is defined outside the namespace, are its enumeration values externally visible?
- Copying virtual base class results in losing shared_ptr owned object
- How does C++23 happens before apply to std::memory_order_seq_cst?
- Are repeated declarations of a template with a type-template-parameter defaulted to a closure type a violation of ODR?
- Modifying a global variable in a constexpr function in C++17
- Which part of the C++ standard forbids destroying an object twice?
- Does the C++ standard forbid reusing storage without destroying?
- Is it well defined to cast generic function pointers to specifc signatures with void* params pointing to different types
- Why is a double semicolon a SyntaxError in Python?
- Can atomic loads be merged in the C++ memory model?
- Which sort of UB do I have here, deleting array of operator new[]?
- Is shifting 0 to the left considered undefined behavior in C?
- How to determine whether the following switch block is exhaustive?
- Definite matching in Java pattern matching
- Implicitly changing the active union member between two members of the same primitive type
- C++ Aliasing a type with the same name
- Does calling a dependent function that has not been yet declared at the point of template definition cause the program to be IFNDR?
- Does C++11 allow dollar signs in identifiers?
- What are the prohibitions against certain kinds of aliasing through unions?
- Does calling non-const mem. fun. on const object via non-const ref obtained via const_cast invoke UB only if the fun actually modifies the object?
- Common initial sequence with nested struct
- Is there a way to assert something about an argument to a consteval function, with a meaningful error message on failure
- C++14 constexpr function requirements on cppreference
- Error when binding a constexpr reference to variable of different type
- Is there inlinable function for pow2?
- Can & (address-of-operator) ever return nullptr?
- C++17 Are non-static POD class members initialized with curly braces {} set to 0?
- Why can’t I use a unary operator in a chained assignment, but only in separate assignment statements?