The built in static method BindingOperations.EnableCollectionSynchronization
requires a general object.
.Net 9 has introduced the class System.Threading.Lock
that improves performance and is a specific class for performing locks.
What is the alternative in this case to use the Lock itself?
You should be able to use the following overload to use the new Lock
type:
BindingOperations.EnableCollectionSynchronization(IEnumerable, object, CollectionSynchronizationCallback)
Enables a CollectionView object to participate in synchronized access to a collection used on multiple threads by using a mechanism other than a simple lock.
You could use it via an extension method like so:
public static class BindingOperationsExtensions
{
static CollectionSynchronizationCallback callback = static (collection, context, accessMethod, writeAccess) =>
{
var @lock = (Lock)context;
using (@lock.EnterScope())
{
accessMethod();
}
};
public static void EnableCollectionLock(IEnumerable collection, Lock @lock)
{
#pragma warning disable CS9216
ArgumentNullException.ThrowIfNull(collection);
ArgumentNullException.ThrowIfNull(@lock);
// We know the lock will only be used by our static callback, so suppress warning CS9216:
// https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/csharp/language-reference/compiler-messages/lock-semantics#lock-warning
BindingOperations.EnableCollectionSynchronization(collection, @lock, callback);
#pragma warning restore CS9216
}
}
Then, in your view model on the UI thread, following Using BindingOperations.EnableCollectionSynchronization you would have something like:
class ViewModel
{
public ObservableCollection<string> Items { get; } = new();
private readonly System.Threading.Lock _itemsLock = new ();
public ViewModel()
{
BindingOperationsExtensions.EnableCollectionLock(Items, _itemsLock);
}
In other threads, use the _itemsLock
via any of the methods shown in the Lock
docs:
using (_itemsLock.EnterScope()) { /* Your code */ }
if (_itemsLock.TryEnter(someTimeoutTimeSpan))
try
{
/* Your code */
}
finally { _itemsLock.Exit(); }
lock (_itemsLock) { /* Your code */ }
._itemsLock
is properly declared as System.Lock
and not object
if you use this syntax.Note that, according to the reference source, the callback currently seems to be called via an untyped Invoke()
, so if you are concerned with performance you might want to profile.