Can we use more than one mock object in a unit test?

I have read many articles about unit testing. Most of the articles said that we should not use more than one mock object in a test, but i can't understand why. Sometimes we really need more than one mock object in a test.

You should add as many mocks as necessary to isolate your class under test. You need a mock for every dependency that should not be part of the test.

Sometimes you put two or three classes together in a test, for simplicity, because they build something like a component and are highly coupled. Everything else should be mocked.

I know this "best practice" to have only one mock and also do not understand it. In our unit tests, we have many mocks, some environmental mocks are set up by the test framework I wrote (eg. TransactionService, SecurityService, SessionService). There is only one thing to consider, as Gishu already mentioned in his answer, many mocks are an indication of high dependency. It's up to you to consider when it is too much. We have many small interfaces, which requires many mocks in tests.

To turn your answer around, you should not mock a dependency when:

• It is a highly coupled part of the class under test, like an inner class, private class etc.
• It is a common .NET framework class like a Collection and the like
• You want to write an integration test to test exactly the interaction with that class. (You still mock everything else and you still have unit tests for every involved class in isolation.)
• It is just to expensive to mock a certain class. Be careful with deciding it as too expensive, mocks seem to be hard to set up, but turn out to be a breeze compared to the maintainability problems you'll have with using real classes. But there are some frameworks and technologies that are not implementing against interfaces and are very hard to mock. If it is too expensive to put this framework classes behind your own interface, you need to live with them in the tests.