Both return the same pointer. I know - bytes belongs to NSData, why does NSMutableData introduce - mutableBytes? Is it just for code clarity so it is more obvious you are accessing mutable data? Does it really matter which one is used?
NSMutableData* mydata = [[NSMutableData alloc] init];
[mydata appendData: [@"hello" dataUsingEncoding:NSUTF8StringEncoding]];
NSLog(@"%p", [mydata mutableBytes]);
NSLog(@"%p", [mydata bytes]);
Thanks.
There are a couple of reasons why NSMutableData might provide a separate mutableBytes method:
As you suggested in your question, using mutableBytes makes it clear to the reader that you want to change the data.
The bytes method returns a const void *. The mutableBytes method returns a void *. If you want to change the bytes, you need a void * with no const qualifier. The mutableBytes method eliminates the need to cast away the const qualifier.
In theory there could be a third reason: the -[NSData mutableCopy] method could return an NSMutableData that points to the same buffer as the original NSData, and only create a new, mutable copy of the buffer when you call mutableBytes. However, I don't think it's implemented this way based on my very limited testing.