rperformancespatialrcpprcpp11

Closest point to a path


I have two sets of points, called path and centers. For each point in path, I would like an efficient method for finding the ID of the closest point in centers. I would like to do this in R. Below is a simple reproducible example.

set.seed(1)
n <- 10000
x <- 100*cumprod(1 + rnorm(n, 0.0001, 0.002))
y <- 50*cumprod(1 + rnorm(n, 0.0001, 0.002))

path <- data.frame(cbind(x=x, y=y))

centers <- expand.grid(x=seq(0, 500,by=0.5) + rnorm(1001), 
                       y=seq(0, 500, by=0.2) + rnorm(2501))

centers$id <- seq(nrow(centers))

x and y are coordinates. I would like to add a column to the path data.frame that has the id of the closest center for the given x and y co-ordinate. I then want to get all of the unique ids.

My solution at the moment does work, but is very slow when the scale of the problem increases. I would like something much more efficient.

path$closest.id <- sapply(seq(nrow(path)), function(z){
   tmp <- ((centers$x - path[z, 'x'])^2) + ((centers$y - path[z, 'y'])^2)
   as.numeric(centers[tmp == min(tmp), 'id'])
})

output <- unique(path$closest.id)

Any help on speeding this up would be greatly appreciated.

I think data.table might help, but ideally what I am looking for is an algorithm that is perhaps a bit smarter in terms of the search, i.e. instead of calculating the distances to each center and then only selecting the minimum one... to get the id...

I am also happy to use Rcpp/Rcpp11 as well if that would help improve performance.

My minimum acceptable time to perform this kind of calculation out would be 10 seconds, but obviously faster would be better.


Solution

  • You can do this with nn2 from the RANN package. On my system, this computes the nearest center to each of your path points in under 2 seconds.

    library(RANN)
    system.time(closest <- nn2(centers[, 1:2], path, 1))
    
    #   user  system elapsed 
    #   1.41    0.14    1.55 
    
    
    
    sapply(closest, head)
    
    #      nn.idx   nn.dists
    # [1,] 247451 0.20334929
    # [2,] 250454 0.12326323
    # [3,] 250454 0.28540127
    # [4,] 253457 0.05178687
    # [5,] 253457 0.13324137
    # [6,] 253457 0.09009626
    

    Here's another example with 2.5 million candidate points that all fall within the extent of the path points (in your example, the centers have a much larger x and y range than do the path points). It's a little slower in this case.

    set.seed(1)
    centers2 <- cbind(runif(2.5e6, min(x), max(x)), runif(2.5e6, min(y), max(y)))
    system.time(closest2 <- nn2(centers2, path, 1))
    
    #   user  system elapsed 
    #   2.96    0.11    3.07 
    
    sapply(closest2, head)
    
    #       nn.idx    nn.dists
    # [1,]  730127 0.025803703
    # [2,]  375514 0.025999069
    # [3,] 2443707 0.047259283
    # [4,]   62780 0.022747930
    # [5,] 1431847 0.002482623
    # [6,] 2199405 0.028815865
    

    This can be compared to the output using sp::spDistsN1 (which is much slower for this problem):

    library(sp)
    apply(head(path), 1, function(x) which.min(spDistsN1(centers, x)))
    
    #       1       2       3       4       5       6 
    #  730127  375514 2443707   62780 1431847 2199405 
    

    Adding the point id to the path data.frame and reducing to unique values is trivial:

    path$closest.id <- closest$nn.idx
    output <- unique(path$closest.id)