I've recently read about [[nodiscard]]
in C++17, and as far as I understand it's a new feature (design by contract?) which forces you to use the return value. This makes sense for controversial functions like std::launder
(nodiscard since C++20), but I wonder why std::move
isn't defined like so in C++17/20. Do you know a good reason or is it because C++20 isn't finalised yet?
AFAIK P0600R1 is the only proposal for adding [[nodiscard]]
to the standard library that was applied to C++20. From that paper:
We suggest a conservative approach:
[...]
It should not be added when:
- [...]
- not using the return value makes no sense but doesn’t hurt and is usually not an error
- [...]
So, [[nodiscard]] should not signal bad code if this
- [...]
- doesn’t hurt and probably no state change was meant that doesn’t happen
So the reason is that the standard library uses a conservative approach and a more aggresive one is not yet proposed.