Is left-to-right evaluation of logical operators (&&
||
) guaranteed?
Let's say I have this:
SDL_Event event;
if (SDL_PollEvent(&event)) {
if (event.type == SDL_QUIT) {
// do stuff
}
}
Is this guaranteed to be the same as this?
SDL_Event event;
if (SDL_PollEvent(&event) && event.type == SDL_QUIT) {
// do stuff
}
This can also be very important, let's say we have two requirements, a
and b
. Requirement a
is much more likely to fail then b
. Then it's more efficient to say if (a && b)
than if (b && a)
.
Yes, it's guaranteed, otherwise such operators would lose much of their usefulness.
Important notice: this is valid only for the builtin &&
and ||
; if some criminal overloads them, they are treated as "regular" overloaded binary operators, so in this case both operands are always evaluated, and in unspecified order as usual. For this reason, never overload them - it breaks a hugely important assumption about the control flow of the program.
&&
and ||
have guaranteed short-circuit behavior§5.14 ¶1
Unlike
&
,&&
guarantees left-to-right evaluation: the second operand is not evaluated if the first operand isfalse
.
§5.15 ¶1
Unlike
|
,||
guarantees left-to-right evaluation; moreover, the second operand is not evaluated if the first operand evaluates totrue
.
§13.5 ¶9
Operators not mentioned explicitly in subclauses 13.5.3 through 13.5.7 act as ordinary unary and binary operators obeying the rules of 13.5.1 or 13.5.2.
and &&
and ||
are not mentioned explicitly in these subclauses, so regular §13.5.2 holds:
§13.5.2 ¶1
A binary operator shall be implemented either by a non-static member function (9.3) with one parameter or by a non-member function with two parameters. Thus, for any binary operator
@
,x@y
can be interpreted as eitherx.operator@(y)
oroperator@(x,y)
.
with no special provision for evaluating only one side or in a particular order.
(all quotations from the C++11 standard)